I appreciate this colloquy and your intent to meet all the new, as well as old, ethics requirements regarding earmarks in appropriations bills. This is the first year for implementation of many of these new ethics rules and there has been some not unexpected confusion over how some of the new requirements must be implemented. I applaud your aggressiveness in making sure that you have done everything within your knowledge and power to ensure that you have complied with all the rules and requirements that are specified by the rules of the Senate with regard to the use of earmarks. Our discussion today provides the type of transparency intended by the ethics rules and should satisfy all requirements with regard to letters of pecuniary interest and earmarks as they relate to your situation.
Thad Cochran: “I appreciate this colloquy and your intent to meet all the new, as well as old, ethics requirements regarding earmarks…”
On the recordDecember 18, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implementation of new ethics requirements for earmarks in appropriations bills.
Share
More from Thad Cochran
Jun 5, 2017
And I plan to use my best efforts to identify the areas that we can make improvements in, and take a hard look, but at the same time realize we need to get a bill.
Jun 6, 2017
I understand that the Army's unfunded requirements list includes a $3.1 billion increase in end strength beyond the fiscal year 2017 NDAA mandate.
Jun 6, 2017
If we go back in sequestration, what affect would it have on the Corps of Engineers, Mr. Speer?
May 24, 2017
We appreciate very much your leadership in the research effort and we commend you and those who work with you for helping make sure we have what we need in order to make our nation safe and secure.





