Political Quotes

On the recordJuly 20, 2000
I struck the language that he suggested bothered him. He read that language to be ``that is shown to be adulterated.'' He was worried about connecting proof of contaminated food with the ability of the Department of Agriculture to shut down a plant. And he thought with the addition of those words I was adding something new, a new hurdle that had to be crossed by the Department of Agriculture in implementing the standards. So I modified the amendment to remove the troublesome words, to assure him the crux of the amendment was to get the advice and the input of the experts, the scientific experts. And I modified it. And that is not enough. Now the Senator wants me to interpret the legal status of these regulations as they are affected by this district court decision in Texas. This morning I tried to put that all in context. I know I am taking much too much time. I discussed the reasons for my motion to table the Harkin amendment. I have just about gotten worn out with explaining why I wanted to table the Harkin amendment, why I thought it was an amendment that ought not be put on this Agriculture appropriations bill. I have said it over and over again. The Senate voted on that, and the motion to table was not agreed to. The vote was tied, 49-49.
Said by
Thad Cochran
Republican · Mississippi

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the amendment process related to food safety regulations during Senate debate.

Share

More from Thad Cochran

May 3, 2017

Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.

congress.gov
Feb 27, 2017

the Senate Committee on Appropriations has adopted rules governing its procedures for the 115th Congress. Pursuant to rule XXVI, paragraph 2, of the Standing Rules of the Senate, on behalf of myself and Vice Chairman Leahy, I ask unanimous…

govinfo.gov
May 3, 2017

I enjoyed working with him to reintroduce the Creating Opportunities Now for Necessary and Effective Care Technologies (CONNECT) for Health Act yesterday.

congress.gov
Apr 5, 2017

The Sleep Research Society is pleased to submit this statement for the record asking you to provide $250 billion for the Department of Defense (DOD) Peer Reviewed Medical Research Program.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation