One question I have that has not been brought out here was that this suit not only requested a ruling as to these five legislators, but, more important, with respect to Judge Dennis, it involved all legislators' records, as to whether or not they were public records. And the reason this is important as far as Judge Dennis is concerned--and did the committee know this?--that he was a legislator before he was a judge, and he had awarded scholarships to Tulane and therefore records that he had control over, under the ruling of the lower court, made him a party in interest even though he was not a named defendant?
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a legal suit involving legislators' records and Judge Dennis.
Share
More from Thad Cochran
I appreciate the opportunity to express my deep gratitude for the honor given to me by the people of Mississippi to represent them in Washington. I leave the Senate with confidence that our enduring Constitution guards our country from…
this afternoon, the Senate will consider the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2017. The bill will fund the Federal Government for the remainder of this fiscal year. I urge the Senate to approve the bill. It provides our Armed Forces with…
We appreciate that the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee and the Senate play important roles in crafting the annual eligible conditions list.
If we go back in sequestration, what affect would it have on the Corps of Engineers, Mr. Speer?





