Thad Cochran actually said...
Due to the consequences and implications of the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Integrated Risk Information System assessment of inorganic arsenic on drinking water, agriculture practices, and the perceived safety of the food supply compliance, do you agree the EPA should extend the comment period by 30 days and include a broader peer review?
Context
Cochran questions the adequacy of the EPA's comment period on arsenic assessments.
03/02/2010