Due to the consequences and implications of the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Integrated Risk Information System assessment of inorganic arsenic on drinking water, agriculture practices, and the perceived safety of the food supply compliance, do you agree the EPA should extend the comment period by 30 days and include a broader peer review?
Cochran questions the adequacy of the EPA's comment period on arsenic assessments.
Share
More from Thad Cochran
Could you tell us more about the telehealth services you offer and some of the successes the University of Mississippi in particular, has experienced through telehealth.
And I plan to use my best efforts to identify the areas that we can make improvements in, and take a hard look, but at the same time realize we need to get a bill.
Other voices in this conversation
