Due to the consequences and implications of the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Integrated Risk Information System assessment of inorganic arsenic on drinking water, agriculture practices, and the perceived safety of the food supply compliance, do you agree the EPA should extend the comment period by 30 days and include a broader peer review?
Cochran questions the adequacy of the EPA's comment period on arsenic assessments.
Share
More from Thad Cochran
I think the complementary and coordination of biomedical research with the Department of Defense, the VA, and NIH is very important.
I look forward to hearing from all the witnesses today, especially Michael Adcock from the University of Mississippi Medical Center in Jackson.
I enjoyed working with him to reintroduce the Creating Opportunities Now for Necessary and Effective Care Technologies (CONNECT) for Health Act yesterday.
I am pleased to commend LTC Daniel S. Artino for his dedication to duty and service as an Army legislative fellow and congressional budget liaison for the Assistant Secretary of the Army. Dan was recently selected to command an Apache…
Other voices in this conversation
