2 weeks ago, I came to the Senate floor to express my concern that Congress had yet to act on the President's fiscal year 2008 request for supplemental funding to support our troops and our efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan. At that time, I also expressed my displeasure with the majority's intention to bypass the Appropriations Committee in writing the supplemental appropriations bill. Two weeks later, little appears to have changed. Little has changed, except that we are 2 weeks deeper into the fiscal year, and we are 2 weeks closer to the date when accounts that support our Armed Forces and our diplomatic corps begin to run dry. The majority leader is apparently sanguine about the status of the supplemental because last Thursday, he said: I think we'll do our best to finish this before the Memorial Day break, but if we don't, it's no big deal. There's money there. The leader then went on to say: I don't know why there is a rush to judgment. This is moving along quite rapidly. We're not behind schedule. Everything's fine. Exactly what is 'moving along quite rapidly'? No markup of the supplemental has been officially scheduled in either the House or the Senate. There are continued reports of imminent action in the other body, but no bill has been introduced. No bill or report has been circulated to Senate committee members in anticipation of a markup. There is nothing for Members to look at, nothing for Members to consider or to draft amendments to.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about the lack of action on supplemental funding for troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Share
More from Thad Cochran
I am pleased to support the nomination of Randy Reeves of Mississippi to serve as Under Secretary for Memorial Affairs at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Mr. Reeves, a retired, U.S. Navy commander, has distinguished himself in…
Could you tell us more about the telehealth services you offer and some of the successes the University of Mississippi in particular, has experienced through telehealth.
If we go back in sequestration, what affect would it have on the Corps of Engineers, Mr. Speer?
I ask unanimous consent to proceed, but before I begin, I ask unanimous consent that the Senator from California, Mrs. Boxer, be recognized following my remarks. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.





