I will be proposing an amendment, joined by Senators Gregg and Schumer, that will stop the Federal Government from wasting taxpayers' dollars on an unnecessary and outdated sugar program that costs consumers as much as $2 billion in inflated sugar prices. The amendment is simple. It withholds funding for the costly Federal sugar program for fiscal year 2001. Mr. President, my colleagues and I are here today to say enough is enough. The American taxpayers have subsidized the sugar industry, with price support loans and strict import quotas in various forms, since 1934. Each year American taxpayers pay close to $2 billion in artificially high sugar prices and this year paid an additional $60 million to bail out sugar producers facing massive loan defaults.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment to eliminate funding for the Federal sugar program during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Thad Cochran
I wish to commend Dr. Jeffery P. Holland for 37 years of service to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Dr. Holland will soon retire as the Director of the Research and Development and Director of the Corps Engineer Research Center, ERDC…
I am concerned that the 22 percent funding cut proposed for NIH could negatively affect longstanding research endeavors.
today I wish to pay tribute to the U.S. Navy Construction Battalion, also known as the SeaBees, and congratulate them on their 75th anniversary. It was March 5th, 1942, when the SeaBees were charged by the Navy with the task of building…
Robust funding for agricultural research and extension programs is vital to ensuring producers remain competitive domestically and globally.





