I think the staff has now concluded in another way. I do not know whether there is any evidence that the Senator can give the Senate about what the staff has concluded. But in today's Times-Picayune, there is a statement from a reporter who called and talked with staff members of the Judiciary Committee. And it says, ``At issue is Dennis' vote in a 6-to-1 Supreme Court decision in March to deny'' the newspaper's ``request for access to the . . . forms.'' And it says one staff member says that there was nothing new discovered. Another says there are questions raised about whether he should have recused himself. So the paper has discovered that committee staff has a difference of opinion. I was briefed and I can say that my impression was there is a serious question and that is why this motion is being made.
On the recordSeptember 28, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing a Supreme Court decision and staff opinions regarding a senator's recusal.
Share
More from Thad Cochran
Jan 22, 2018
the language in section 148 of the continuing resolution is included exactly as requested by the administration. It is consistent with language that has been adopted many times in past continuing resolutions. The appropriation for missile…
Jun 21, 2017
I am concerned that the 22 percent funding cut proposed for NIH could negatively affect longstanding research endeavors.
Sep 14, 2017
I wish to honor former Senator Pete V. Domenici of New Mexico, who passed away September 13 in Albuquerque. It was a privilege to call Pete a friend and to work with him as a Senate colleague and member of the Appropriations Committee…





