It would be more damaging than a nuclear bomb, would it not?
Roger Wicker: “It would be more damaging than a nuclear bomb, would it not?”
Editor's note · Context
Wicker emphasizes the severity of an electromagnetic pulse threat.
Share
More from Roger Wicker
This legislation would update performance standards—protecting passenger safety and promoting innovation simultaneously.
The sons and daughters of our fallen service members carry on the legacies of their parents. We set aside this day to honor them and to remember the sacrifices of their mothers and fathers.
I also oppose the U.S. lifting any sanctions on Iran, or unfreezing Iranian funds, in exchange for Iran’s mere agreement to negotiate for another 60 days.
The $300 billion fund for the reconstruction and economic development of Iran — though not funded by U.S. taxpayers — would make Iran’s payoff under President Obama’s 2015 deal look like a pittance by comparison.





