Mr. Chairman, let me just respond to the gentlewoman from California who complained that we have now passed a rule that is going to take a lot of time here. First of all, the leadership has given its commitment that we will vote on this issue in August, and I believe they will honor that commitment. Now, beyond that, when a proposal such as this, which I believe fervently strikes at the heart of free expression and the first amendment, comes forward, then I do not apologize for wanting to take the time to fully explore all the issues and to explore the ramifications and to look at alternatives. I do not apologize for that. I think it is going to take some time, but it is worth it if we can get the point across to the American people that this is going to the heart of freedom of speech.
Roger Wicker: “Mr. Chairman, let me just respond to the gentlewoman from California who complained that we have now passed a rule that…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about the time taken to discuss a proposal related to free expression and the First Amendment.
Share
More from Roger Wicker
We should enact this bipartisan measure to exert maximum economic pressure on Putin’s war machine and help bring this unjust war to an end.
This legislation would update performance standards—protecting passenger safety and promoting innovation simultaneously.
I also oppose the U.S. lifting any sanctions on Iran, or unfreezing Iranian funds, in exchange for Iran’s mere agreement to negotiate for another 60 days.
Had the White House asked me for advice, I would have suggested the president not invite Xi Jinping to Washington for such a lavish welcome here in the United States, based on all of the troubling issues we have with President Xi and the…





