I oppose the resolution. My friend from New Hampshire has said: Let's inspect catfish like all other catfish. I would tell her and I would tell my colleagues that American-produced catfish is inspected by the USDA at a rate of 100 percent. If the resolution passes, that will not apply to foreign catfish. How does that make sense? How is that fair to Americans? How is that fair to American consumers when we have information that indicates clearly that there are different, less safe procedures overseas than we have in the United States? Yes, let's treat all catfish the same. We inspect American catfish; let's inspect foreign catfish. We can say this new program is expensive, and I guess if we say it enough, it becomes true. But the fact is that the agency that is going to enforce this program, the USDA, says it is going to cost $1.1 million a year. It seems like a reasonable cost to prevent cancer- causing agents from coming in from overseas, goods that will be eaten by Americans. One could say that it is duplicative, and I guess if it is said enough, one might think it becomes true. But the fact is that the FDA is out of the inspection business, according to law, and the USDA is in the business, and they can do it for $1 million a year. That is not a duplication. Saying it is expensive doesn't make it true, and saying it is duplicative doesn't make it true. The facts are exactly otherwise. This is about food safety.…
On the recordMay 25, 2016
Source
govinfo.govShare
More from Roger Wicker
Apr 28, 2025
I ask unanimous consent that the mandatory quorum call with respect to the Perdue nomination be waived. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. The Senator from Illinois.
Apr 10, 2025
I am happy to yield to my friend from Alaska, who has now vacated the floor. I thought we had this more synchronized. But let me say this: There was a vote earlier this week in the Armed Services Committee. It passed the Armed Services…
Nov 30, 2025
The Committee is aware of recent news reports – and the Department of Defense’s initial response – regarding alleged follow-on strikes on suspected narcotics vessels in the SOUTHCOM area of responsibility.





