I would answer: Yes, indeed, her record, taken together with her committee testimony, tells us a lot about Ms. Kagan's insight and feelings about the second amendment. Let me agree with my colleague from Connecticut, however, and say I don't believe it is necessary for someone to have judicial experience to be an effective member of the Supreme Court. Clearly that is not called for in the Constitution. However, in a situation such as this, where the nominee has never written a judicial opinion of her own, where she has hardly any experience at all in the courtroom, I do think it is appropriate--and actually necessary--for us to examine her life experience and see what insights we can gain on her views on the second amendment. I would also say this: The debate is drawing to a close. The issue is probably not in doubt, but I think we owe it to the Record, we owe it to our constituents, we owe it to the American people to outline our concerns with regard to the second amendment to the Constitution, to the second article in the Bill of Rights.
Editor's note · Context
Wicker discusses concerns regarding Elena Kagan's views on the Second Amendment during her Supreme Court nomination.
Share
More from Roger Wicker
now let me say that I come to the floor today to join with President Trump and with a bipartisan majority of my colleagues in the Senate in calling for another tougher round of sanctions against Russia and its war machine. For the past 8…
Illegal, unreported, and unregulated Chinese fishing vessels threaten the American maritime economy.
Our colleagues in the House of Representatives have passed this year's National Defense Authorization Act, and we are about to follow suit. This will be the 65th year in a row--the 65th consecutive year--that Congress has come together…
this week, we began a new year's work here in the Congress. But as we open this chapter, I have a bittersweet task of helping to close another. Beside me sits John Patrick Keast, my longtime adviser and friend. In a few short days, John…





