I rise in support of this budget resolution. Mr. Chairman, I want to commend the gentleman from Minnesota, the chairman of the Budget Committee, and all the members of the Budget Committee, for bringing this resolution to the floor. As my colleagues know, CBO estimated that the President's budget was $3.1 billion over the discretionary caps we established last year. As a result, almost all of the President's proposals to increase spending above the 1994 level had to be pared back by the Budget Committee. Proposed increases for the National Service Program, mass transit grants, and energy conservation programs had to be scaled back because of this problem. But the President's proposed increase of $500 million above the 1994 level for VA medical care was left intact. In addition, the Budget Committee has recommended that the VA's award-winning medical research program be increased by $41 million above the President's request. I want veterans to know that Chairman Sabo and members of his committee had to make some very tough decisions. Not only did they avoid taking any money out of the veterans budget to make up this $3.1 billion difference, they added $41 million for VA medical research. Although I believe the Budget Committee did what it had to do, I want Members to know that service to veterans is not going to get any better under this budget, and will probably get a little worse.
Gillespie Montgomery: “I rise in support of this budget resolution. Mr. Chairman, I want to commend the gentleman from Minnesota, the chairman…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the budget resolution and its impact on veterans' services.
Share
More from Gillespie Montgomery
I talked to the director of the Selective Service System, Mr. Banister, on Friday to be sure that I had my facts and statements correct. I talked to the Selective Service director himself. He said if you stopped registration of…
Every day I have Members come up to me and complain about the service that the veterans are receiving in their veterans hospitals... a cut of 25,000 employees would be devastating to the veterans hospitals; 5,000 jobs would be lost in…
if the gentlewoman will yield, let me assure the gentlewoman that this sunset should not have a negative impact on the local hiring preference authorized by her amendment. A sunset is a useful tool to ensure Congress has the opportunity to…
I am concerned about he veterans' funding under the Kasich amendment. We have examined it very closely. It seems that the bottom line for veterans' health care for 1995 under the Kasich amendment is that health care will lose $475 million…





