I am concerned about he veterans' funding under the Kasich amendment. We have examined it very closely. It seems that the bottom line for veterans' health care for 1995 under the Kasich amendment is that health care will lose $475 million. The gentleman from Ohio [Mr. Kasich], on page 17 of the Republican substitute or of his amendment give us $110 million. That is great. That is for health care, for helping process claims. But back on page 24 under the 1994 investments that were put in our legislation for veterans' health care in 1994, he eliminates that, which is around $585 million. If you subtract the $110 million he gave us on page 17 from the $585 million he takes away on page 24, the veterans come up short $475 million. Am I right or wrong? I just need an answer.
Gillespie Montgomery: “I am concerned about he veterans' funding under the Kasich amendment. We have examined it very closely. It seems that…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing veterans' funding and the impact of the Kasich amendment on health care.
Share
More from Gillespie Montgomery
Every day I have Members come up to me and complain about the service that the veterans are receiving in their veterans hospitals... a cut of 25,000 employees would be devastating to the veterans hospitals; 5,000 jobs would be lost in…
The contracting officers at the affected bases are expected to be vigilant in ensuring that an entity's plan to hire locally is a serious, well conceived plan with a reasonable probability of actual implementation.
The gentleman is correct. In awarding contracts at both closing and receiving bases, a preference may be given to entities that plan to hire locally.
If you saw all the white crosses, at the different American cemeteries, you realize war is really devastating, and if you also realize that those young men buried under those crosses were 18 and 19 years old, young men who really had just…





