I am concerned about he veterans' funding under the Kasich amendment. We have examined it very closely. It seems that the bottom line for veterans' health care for 1995 under the Kasich amendment is that health care will lose $475 million. The gentleman from Ohio [Mr. Kasich], on page 17 of the Republican substitute or of his amendment give us $110 million. That is great. That is for health care, for helping process claims. But back on page 24 under the 1994 investments that were put in our legislation for veterans' health care in 1994, he eliminates that, which is around $585 million. If you subtract the $110 million he gave us on page 17 from the $585 million he takes away on page 24, the veterans come up short $475 million. Am I right or wrong? I just need an answer.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing veterans' funding and the impact of the Kasich amendment on health care.
Share
More from Gillespie Montgomery
I talked to the director of the Selective Service System, Mr. Banister, on Friday to be sure that I had my facts and statements correct. I talked to the Selective Service director himself. He said if you stopped registration of…
Every day I have Members come up to me and complain about the service that the veterans are receiving in their veterans hospitals... a cut of 25,000 employees would be devastating to the veterans hospitals; 5,000 jobs would be lost in…
later today I and my colleagues, Jim Slattery of Kansas, J. Roy Rowland of Georgia, Joe Kennedy of Massachusetts, and Bob Clement of Tennessee, will introduce legislation to pay compensation to veterans who served in the Persian Gulf and…
I really appreciate this time and would just like to briefly and very regretfully speak against the chairman of the Committee on Veterans' Affairs' legislation here. The simple fact is that the entire Federal work force has to be…





