I am particularly much aware of the Federal flood insurance program, since a good portion of my district was devastated during Hurricane Camille, after Hurricane Frederick. As the gentleman knows from the Federal flood insurance program, the government goes in and sets a minimum at which your house can be built, so many feet off the ground, so that the people of this country are not turning around and reimbursing the same people over and over every time there is a high tide. It has turned out to be I think a very good program and it has helped people like myself to be able to live where I live, but also set some reasonable guidelines as to how I can construct my house. I think it is a two-way street. My question is when the Federal Government, through the Federal flood insurance program, comes in and says your minimum structure will look like this, your minimal floor will be so many feet off the ground so as to prevent it from flooding every time there is a high tide, does that constitute a taking, because it has increased the cost of my building my house?
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Federal flood insurance program and its impact on building regulations.
Share
More from Gene Taylor
I regret that we really do not do enough. We are now down to a fleet of about 300 ships. And at the rate we are going, we are on our way to a fleet of 140 ships. Fleet age used to be about 30 years. We are now down to keeping them for…
we are barely 3 hours into this Congress and the political hedonists of this Congress have struck their first blow. You know hedonism, if it feels good do it regardless of the consequences. Well, that is exactly what those people who have…
I want to thank our acquisition folks for being here today. I think that the purpose of this is not just to educate a couple of Congressmen, but to let the moms and dads and loved ones of the people in uniform know what the military is…
if only what the previous speaker said were true. If only he really cared about a balanced budget. There is an amendment that would require Congress to spend no more money than it collects in taxes, and it has been languishing in this…





