Okay, so it seems to me we have got a couple of different issues here that you brought up. The first question is, does it even make sense for us to do the ``what if'' question? If somebody does this, this, and this, well, we are not going to do that. What is that bias, you know, and is that really helpful? And particularly when these things tend to be nuanced the way they are phrased, it adds a lot of haze and uncertainty. But certainly answering that ``what if'' question probably doesn't make us a more secure country. But let's go to what I think is your second point.
W. Todd Akin: “Okay, so it seems to me we have got a couple of different issues here that you brought up. The first question is, does…”
On the recordApril 14, 2010
Editor's note · Context
The speaker is discussing the implications of hypothetical scenarios in security discussions.
Share
More from W. Todd Akin
Jun 19, 2012
This bill doesn't cost any money. The people who want the I.D. card simply pay for it.
Mar 6, 2012
Given that the new defense strategy focuses on only executing 1 major contingency operation, why would it not be prudent to keep at least 38 C-27Js, or more to reduce the assessed risk, in the inventory to meet warfighting requirements…
Aug 21, 2012
I knew that the party voters took a look at our hearts, understood who we were, had a chance to meet us in many, many different ways, and made the decision, and it makes me uncomfortable to think that the party bosses are going to dictate…





