I have to say in terms of sympathy, I understand the motivation I believe and the interest in our troops that this legislation is designed to deal with. I have two marines that are my sons. I have visited the one when he was in Fallujah. I talked to a number of their troops. I think I understand the stresses that are involved in warfare, also as somebody who served as an officer myself. That said, however, I think there is a danger when we take a look at a specific problem and we try to micromanage a solution from the position of Congress. It didn't work during the War of Independence. And the trade-offs as to whether or not you are going to leave somebody in theater longer, there are a lot of different factors that you have to balance and a lot of special situations. To give you one that seems a little bit obvious, I suspect that General Petraeus and other generals have been in theater a pretty long time. They probably would have to get a special waiver from the President to do their jobs. We understand it would be better if they could take a break and see their families more, but the specific situation in their situation calls for the fact that this sort of blanket rule we are going to top- down impose as Congressmen or Congresswomen doesn't make a whole lot of sense.
W. Todd Akin: “I have to say in terms of sympathy, I understand the motivation I believe and the interest in our troops that this…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of legislation affecting military personnel and the challenges of congressional micromanagement.
Share
More from W. Todd Akin
On rollcall No. 134, 135, and 136, I was delayed and unable to vote. Had I been present, I would have voted ``no'' on all three. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute, as amended. The…
I am a huge state's right guy, but the military is a federal thing and that is why I think it should be there.
On rollcall No. 376, 377 and 378 I was delayed and unable to vote. Had I been present I would have voted ``no'' on rollcall No. 376 ``aye'' on rollcall No. 377 and ``aye'' on rollcall No. 378. Personal Explanation
The $487 billion in cuts imposed upon the defense budget already concern me and I certainly do not support the devastating effect that sequestration will have on national security come this January.





