It's just a treat, Congressman Bishop, to have you here with us today talking about a very important subject, something that is on the front of the minds, I think, of many Americans, understanding that we are buying way too much government than we can afford. Certainly, the guiding compass and the guiding light for us has got to be the U.S. Constitution. And the fact is that we had hundreds of years of history, or at least a hundred of years of history, where the Constitution has stood us in very good stead. And when we get away from our foundational documents and principles, that's when we really start to get into trouble. The principle on defense that was just made--I have to underscore, I'm on the Armed Services Committee. We deal with defense issues day in and day out. And the problem in defense is that the things that are on the drawing board today won't be fielded for probably 10 years in the future. So decisions that we're making today are going to have their effect a long way out. And that's why we have to be particularly careful. The situation in defense is one that, as you take a look around the world, we are rapidly being challenged by China and Russia, and we are not keeping up in those arms situations where we do not have the capability diplomatically to have options that were otherwise available before when we had put enough funding into defense.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the importance of the U.S. Constitution and defense funding in light of global challenges.
Share
More from W. Todd Akin
On rollcall No. 443 and 444, I was delayed and unable to vote. Had I been present I would have voted ``yea'' on rollcall No. 443, and ``yea'' on rollcall No. 444. Personal Explanation
How much time do I have remaining? The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Missouri has 1\1/2\ minutes remaining.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. We are going to talk for a little while here this afternoon about a subject that is on, I think, everybody's minds regardless of their political affiliations. The more we look at it, the more significant it seems to…
On rollcall Nos. 127 and 128, I would have voted ``yes.'' personal explanation





