They're exactly wrong. They've got it upside down, just as they have it upside down the American Dream is to make people that are poorer richer, not richer people make them poorer. They've got it exactly reversed. If you want jobs, you don't have an employer. It's kind of a basic thing. I very much appreciate your perspective; and what you're saying is, absolutely, you can prove it by taking a look at the economics. But when I first heard that, I was kind of scratching my head. I'm not a wizard at economics but I'm an engineer, and I was trying to say, now, wait a minute, you're telling me that if the Federal Government reduces taxes, they're going to take in more money? That sounds like making water run uphill, you know. And so I started to think about it, and actually it makes a whole lot of sense. But here's the way it seems to work to me. Let's say that Congressman Scalise is king for the year, and your job is to raise revenue for your government and the only thing you can do is tax bread. And so you start rolling this around in your mind, and you say I could put a penny tax on a loaf of bread, or I could put $10 on a loaf of bread. You think, a penny, nobody'd notice it, but I'd have to sell a lot of bread in order to make very much money; but if I did $10 a loaf, wow, wouldn't take too many loaves. I'd get a lot of money. Well, on the other hand, nobody would buy the bread.
W. Todd Akin: “They're exactly wrong. They've got it upside down, just as they have it upside down the American Dream is to make people…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the impact of tax policy on the economy and job creation.
Share
More from W. Todd Akin
On rollcall Nos. 371, 372, 373, 374 and 375 I was delayed and unable to vote. Had I been present I would have voted ``aye'' on rollcall No. 371, ``aye'' on rollcall No. 372, ``aye'' on rollcall No. 373, ``no'' on rollcall No. 374, and…
On rollcall No. 456, 457 and 458 I was delayed and unable to vote. Had I been present I would have voted ``yea'' on rollcall No. 456, ``yea'' on rollcall No. 457 and ``yea'' on rollcall No. 458. PERSONAL EXPLANATION
On rollcall No. 376, 377 and 378 I was delayed and unable to vote. Had I been present I would have voted ``no'' on rollcall No. 376 ``aye'' on rollcall No. 377 and ``aye'' on rollcall No. 378. Personal Explanation
The $487 billion in cuts imposed upon the defense budget already concern me and I certainly do not support the devastating effect that sequestration will have on national security come this January.





