10 percent or whatever. 130 programs serving the disabled. Do we need 130? Maybe it would be better to consolidate, just do a couple of good ones. And then 130 programs serving at-risk youth. And so these are all of these things where you say it doesn't even make common sense. We have to really start getting into analyzing, first of all, should we even be doing it, and then, if we should, do we need hundreds of programs doing something that should be done with one or two. I see that Dr. Gingrey is back at it again. He just couldn't sit still when we talk about cutting things. So just welcome to the discussion.
W. Todd Akin: “10 percent or whatever. 130 programs serving the disabled. Do we need 130? Maybe it would be better to consolidate, just…”
On the recordJanuary 6, 2011
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the need to consolidate numerous government programs serving disabled individuals and at-risk youth.
Share
More from W. Todd Akin
Jun 19, 2012
This bill doesn't cost any money. The people who want the I.D. card simply pay for it.
Aug 21, 2012
I knew that the party voters took a look at our hearts, understood who we were, had a chance to meet us in many, many different ways, and made the decision, and it makes me uncomfortable to think that the party bosses are going to dictate…
Jun 19, 2012
I am a huge state's right guy, but the military is a federal thing and that is why I think it should be there.
Mar 28, 2012
It makes little sense to be shrinking our Navy just months after the announcement of a strategy that would shift emphasis to Asia.





