The basic point is that the fact that this is going to save $310 million is not true. What this in fact is going to do is to force a solution that will be more expensive for the government and not very good for the employees down at Avondale either. So I have to say along with the Navy and the leadership on the committee that we cannot really support this amendment. I think that the gentleman had very good intentions of what he's trying to accomplish, but I don't believe it's going to work the way he thinks it's going to. It's going to probably force a closure and a whole lot of layoffs that unnecessarily would not have to happen if we don't pass this amendment. So I'm going to oppose it. I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Louisiana has 2\1/2\ minutes remaining.
Share
More from W. Todd Akin
On rollcall Nos. 371, 372, 373, 374 and 375 I was delayed and unable to vote. Had I been present I would have voted ``aye'' on rollcall No. 371, ``aye'' on rollcall No. 372, ``aye'' on rollcall No. 373, ``no'' on rollcall No. 374, and…
On rollcall No. 889, 890 and 891, I was delayed and unable to vote. Had I been present I would have voted ``yea'' on all three. ____________________
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I think that perhaps before we give the report on the status of seapower, I would make the comment that if this sequestration goes through, which people are talking about, it gravely influences the ability of our…
How much time do I have remaining? The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Missouri has 1\1/2\ minutes remaining.





