Just to respond briefly here on the subject of missile defense, I know we are working with some en bloc amendments. We're comfortable with those amendments. There is some disagreement on missile defense, and I think at least a considerable vulnerability that many people on our side are very concerned with was the decision not to build a ground base system in Poland and the radar in the Czech Republic, but instead, to suggest that the Aegis class cruisers could cruise around in the ocean and take care of the mission to stop ballistic missiles, particularly a longer range ballistic missile possibly equipped with a nuclear warhead coming out of Iran. The fact of the matter is that the Aegis class missiles do not have the velocity necessary to stop a longer-range ballistic missile. And the only way we had to do that was, quite simply, the ground-based system, which is a 20-ton missile; the Aegis class missiles are more two ton. So there is a factor-of-10 difference in the weight of the missile. Obviously, the much larger missile can develop the velocity it needs to go after a very high-flying, fast-moving ballistic missile that could come from Iran as early as in the next few years. And so there is a serious concern that, in terms of missile defense, we do not really have protection over Western Europe and our troops that are stationed in Western Europe.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses concerns about missile defense capabilities and the decision not to build a ground-based system in Europe.
Share
More from W. Todd Akin
On rollcall Nos. 697 and 698, I was delayed and unable to vote. Had I been present I would have voted ``no'' on rollcall No. 697 and ``aye'' on rollcall No. 698. Authorizing the Clerk to Correct Engrossment
On rollcall Nos. 111 and 112, I was delayed and unable to vote. Had I been present I would have voted ``yea'' on both. The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Yoder). The gentleman from Utah is recognized for 1 hour.
On rollcall No. 376, 377 and 378 I was delayed and unable to vote. Had I been present I would have voted ``no'' on rollcall No. 376 ``aye'' on rollcall No. 377 and ``aye'' on rollcall No. 378. Personal Explanation
The lady before me said it so eloquently and so simply: Why do we want to spend a whole lot of money? We're already in a crisis now. Huge debates about how are we going to control Federal spending. And here we find this proposal to drop…





