The current rule of Don't Ask, Don't Tell says that if you are homosexual and you want to serve in the military, that's fine, but, if your behavior disrupts the mission, you can be discharged. The question then becomes, if we repeal Don't Ask, Don't Tell, what does that mean? Does that mean that we are going to then protect or condone homosexuality? Does it mean that we are going to have to create separate barracks? How do we deal with sexual harassment? What are the implications on recruiting? What are the implications on morale? What are the implications in terms of small unit cohesion? All of these are big question marks, and there are many more besides. Does this impact, for instance, the different benefits and how benefits are delivered? Well, the military leadership doesn't know the answer to these questions any more than we do, so they have said, Please, don't do this. Let us have time to take a look at it, see how it affects overall our national security.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker is addressing concerns about the implications of repealing Don't Ask, Don't Tell in the military.
Share
More from W. Todd Akin
On rollcall Nos. 371, 372, 373, 374 and 375 I was delayed and unable to vote. Had I been present I would have voted ``aye'' on rollcall No. 371, ``aye'' on rollcall No. 372, ``aye'' on rollcall No. 373, ``no'' on rollcall No. 374, and…
On rollcall Nos. 78 and 79, I was delayed and unable to vote. Had I been present, I would have voted ``no'' on No. 78, and ``aye'' on No. 79. ____________________
No, I don't yield. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Missouri controls the time.
On rollcall No. 360 and 361, I was delayed and unable to vote. Had I been present I would have voted ``no'' on rollcall No. 360 and ``aye'' on rollcall No. 361. ____________________





