Assurance to our enemies. But the second thing was the idea that somehow we are going to move toward this world without nukes, and the way we are going to do it is to reduce not only our number of nuclear weapons but reduce our development or deployment of nuclear weapons. I mean, it sounds so good on the surface, but let's just take this apart a little bit. Let's just say, you have got America now. We have a bunch of nuclear weapons, and we just say, hey, this is such a great idea. We are just going to get rid of all our nukes, and we are not going to develop any. Or we are going to get rid of a certain percentage of them, and we are not going to develop any new ones, which is what this treaty is supposed to do. My question is, how is this going to reduce the number of nuclear weapons in the world?
W. Todd Akin: “Assurance to our enemies. But the second thing was the idea that somehow we are going to move toward this world without…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker is discussing the implications of reducing nuclear weapons and the potential effects on global security.
Share
More from W. Todd Akin
The $487 billion in cuts imposed upon the defense budget already concern me and I certainly do not support the devastating effect that sequestration will have on national security come this January.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I think that perhaps before we give the report on the status of seapower, I would make the comment that if this sequestration goes through, which people are talking about, it gravely influences the ability of our…
On rollcall No. 137 and 138, I was delayed and unable to vote. Had I been present, I would have voted ``no'' on rollcall No. 137 and ``aye'' on rollcall No. 138. ____________________





