My concern is that the Department of Defense may interpret this language as direction from Congress to terminate EFV in this year, regardless of any recommendations made by Congress during debate on the fiscal year 2012 budget. No matter how this issue is resolved by Congress in fiscal year 2012, orderly conclusion of the fiscal year 2011 SDD activities that are already under contract and well underway is essential for the Nation to get a usable product for its $3 billion investment. My reading of this language is that it provides sufficient flexibility for the Department to continue through SDD, and we encourage the Department to do just that. Mr. Chairman, is it the intent of the committee to provide sufficient flexibility for the Department to continue SDD activities related to the EFV?
W. Todd Akin: “My concern is that the Department of Defense may interpret this language as direction from Congress to terminate EFV in…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker is addressing concerns about the Department of Defense's interpretation of funding language related to the EFV program.
Share
More from W. Todd Akin
In just about a week or so, we're going to be sitting down at tables celebrating Thanksgiving and eating turkey and getting a little sleepy maybe afterwards. But as we think about Thanksgiving and we think about the holiday of Thanksgiving…
On rollcall No. 468, had I been present, I would have voted ``aye.'' ____________________
On rollcall No. 376, 377 and 378 I was delayed and unable to vote. Had I been present I would have voted ``no'' on rollcall No. 376 ``aye'' on rollcall No. 377 and ``aye'' on rollcall No. 378. Personal Explanation
On rollcall No. 471, I was delayed and unable to vote. Had I been present I would have voted ``yea.'' ____________________





