My sense is the three coequal branches of government means that we have a right to speak when we disagree and that we have even a responsibility to express that disagreement. And so our difference of opinion is that the gentleman really sees them as supreme, as the final decision on everything, and regardless of what they say, we have to suck it in and live with it. What I am saying is, that is alien to the thinking of our Founders. It is completely wrong. Out of my State, I say to the gentleman, came the Dred Scott decision on slavery. I would not sit here and say, oh, I have to sit here and live with it. They are wrong, just as you and I can be wrong. We all make mistakes.
W. Todd Akin: “My sense is the three coequal branches of government means that we have a right to speak when we disagree and that we…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the role of the Supreme Court and the responsibility to disagree with its decisions.
Share
More from W. Todd Akin
On rollcall Nos. 111 and 112, I was delayed and unable to vote. Had I been present I would have voted ``yea'' on both. The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Yoder). The gentleman from Utah is recognized for 1 hour.
On rollcall No. 471, I was delayed and unable to vote. Had I been present I would have voted ``yea.'' ____________________
I know the party voters took a look at our hearts, understood who we were, had a chance to meet us in many, many different ways, and made a decision, and it makes me uncomfortable to think that the party bosses are going to dictate who…
On rollcall Nos. 127 and 128, I would have voted ``yes.'' personal explanation





