I guess I just look at it from the point of view of my constituents. The counties, the several counties that would be tied up in my district are those of the poorest part of my district where there is a great deal of unemployment and a great deal of poverty. The buffer zone where they live is limited in land use for the future, or that is how the proposal was. Consequently, we could not economically develop that area so we could not get more jobs there. The only few jobs we have are tourism-related jobs. We cannot bring in big trucks. We cannot build better highways in that kind of a situation.
Norvell Emerson: “I guess I just look at it from the point of view of my constituents. The counties, the several counties that would be…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing economic development challenges in her district during a floor speech.
Share
More from Norvell Emerson
I too want to thank Mr. Berry and the other sponsors, thank the committee chairman and ranking member, and hope that everyone will be in support of this very commonsense amendment. There is no excuse for FEMA putting at risk the economic…
I rise in support of the Gutknecht amendment. Let me say as one of the Members of the subcommittee who tried to shepherd through last year's reimportation bill, I find it incredulous that every single person who has spoken today against…
I would submit for the Record this letter, statement by the Association of Community Pharmacists in support of H.R. 4 saying H.R. 4 does no harm to community pharmacists. We cannot find any provision in H.R. 4 that would either improve or…
I do not think that the current farm bill or the newly written Farm Security Act, while substantially increasing the funds for rural development, quite frankly, they do not go far enough. As one who represents the largest district…





