Josh Hawley

I just want to be sure that we are not going to events that are funders-only events--funder means donor--that are donor events.

I think that's a big problem. If that is not currently foreclosed by law, we ought to foreclose it, Mr. Chairman.

I want to make sure that we keep the price of electricity affordable, and again, especially in our rural areas in the state, especially working with rural electric co-ops.

Do you think it's appropriate that you would be giving closed-door briefings to donors?

I want to know who the donors are. Can you get me a list?

I want to make sure that this pipeline, which is now FERC-approved, continues to operate and that we don't see major disruptions in service for the residents of the St. Louis region.

I think, is the most potentially--and this quite a high bar I might add--the most unbelievable statement I have heard from a member of this Administration.

You are not moving forward. You are moving backward. You are shutting down and denying permits for mines in this country

I am appalled by the contents of this memo, which made crystal clear that this Administration is literally putting their radical climate change agenda ahead of the needs of the people of Alaska and the United States.

you are sitting here and telling me that we have too many jobs in this country. Are you serious?

your decision to trade off our energy security in favor of a radical climate change agenda is making us more and more dependent on China

I think it reflects the mentality of your Administration, which is when it comes to blue collar workers in this country, you are on your own.

I want to take the strongest possible exception to that comment and to that entire mentality.

I just want to come back, Madam Secretary, to this trade-off between energy security and the radical climate change agenda that you have endorsed.

Why should those things for millions of Americans be sacrificed in favor of your agenda for radical climate change?

I just want to know, do you agree with that, that we should trade off energy security for this country in favor of a climate change agenda?

I just want to know, do you agree with that, that we should trade off energy security for this country in favor of a climate change agenda?

I want to take the strongest possible exception to that comment and to that entire mentality.

you are sitting here and telling me that we have too many jobs in this country. Are you serious?

If the Cook Inlet prospect would be developed, there would be additional government revenues and greater energy security for the State of Alaska . . .

Why should those things for millions of Americans be sacrificed in favor of your agenda for radical climate change?

your decision to trade off our energy security in favor of a radical climate change agenda is making us more and more dependent on China

You are not moving forward. You are moving backward. You are shutting down and denying permits for mines in this country

I think, is the most potentially--and this quite a high bar I might add--the most unbelievable statement I have heard from a member of this Administration.

I am appalled by the contents of this memo, which made crystal clear that this Administration is literally putting their radical climate change agenda ahead of the needs of the people of Alaska and the United States.