this is a very serious structural issue here that we're going to have to think hard about, and the control of this technology by just a handful of companies and governments is a huge, huge problem.
Josh Hawley
The Public Record
Josh David Hawley is an American attorney and politician currently serving as the junior United States senator from Missouri, a position he has held since January 3, 2019. A member of the Republican Party, Hawley previously served as the Attorney General of Missouri from 2017 to 2019. He is known for his focus on issues such as technology regulation, free speech, and conservative social policies. Hawley gained national attention for his opposition to big tech companies and his advocacy for policies aimed at supporting American workers and families.
I think that, for my part, I have expressed my own sense of what our priorities ought to be when it comes to legislation.
The DOJ's own guidelines say that you can't offer this deal. So it's just another example, I think of the sort of sweetheart deal that the Biden seem to get, but it is also just the tip of the iceberg.
I think if we don't do that with China soon--frankly, we should've done it a long time ago--if we don't do it very, very quickly, I think we're in real trouble.
I want to thank Senator Blumenthal for being willing to do something about this problem.
I think we should think of that in a little bit of a different category, and their obligations in a little bit of a different category.
I think we should think of that in a little bit of a different category, and their obligations in a little bit of a different category.
what's wrong with having a technology that actually employs people in the United States of America and pays them well?
It seems to me that your technology melded with theirs could make them an enormous sum of money. That would be great for them. Would it be so good for the American consumer?
I am totally in agreement with Senator Hawley in focusing on keeping it in America, made in America.
Well, you say that you tell the model not to produce misinformation. I'm not sure exactly what that means, but do you tell it not to help massive companies make a profit?
I think your point, Mr. Amodei, about securing our supply chains is absolutely critical.
I'm interested in protecting the rights of American workers and American families and American consumers against these massive companies that threaten to become a total law unto themselves.
Well, you say that you tell the model not to produce misinformation. I'm not sure exactly what that means, but do you tell it not to help massive companies make a profit?
I appreciate that you want your models to be ethical and so forth. That's great.
It's been a privilege to get to work with him. These have been incredibly substantive hearings.
As part of securing our supply chain here in this area, should we consider limitations, if not outright prohibitions, on components that are manufactured in China?
I appreciate that you want your models to be ethical and so forth. That's great.
I think this has surfaced an important point, and I just want to underscore this, because I think it's important.





