This letter is to confirm that the National Venture Capital Association is adamantly opposed to the venture capital provision contained in Section 306 of S. 4. As the President-Elect of NVCA, Patricia Cloherty, stated in a letter dated last Friday, March 11, to all of your colleagues, the creation of still another government backed venture capital program is out of order. Not only is it redundant of an almost identical program authorized two years ago, but because of its emphasis on so-called 'critical technologies,' it smacks of a government directed industrial investment policy. Similar attempts have been made in the past going way back to the Eisenhower Administration and all have ended in abject failure.
John Danforth: “This letter is to confirm that the National Venture Capital Association is adamantly opposed to the venture capital…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing opposition to a venture capital provision in legislation.
Share
More from John Danforth
He was creating an event. He was doing, by his action, he was creating a time and a place that would be the focal point for what turned out to be the darkest day in American history.
I might suggest to the Senator from Michigan, it is enough to persuade the yet unpersuaded to retire.
The planned short increases will enable a substantially higher Federal investment in technology with strong commercial application as called for by the Clinton Administration's economic plan. I do think it is a difference in economic…
That is correct. The authorization for 1995 is $1.370 million and in 1996, it is $1.478 billion; the grand total being $2.8 billion. It is the contention of this Senator that that reflects a ballooning of the cost of these programs, and…





