The planned short increases will enable a substantially higher Federal investment in technology with strong commercial application as called for by the Clinton Administration's economic plan. I do think it is a difference in economic philosophy. I do think it is a basic difference in policy dealing with the degree to which the Federal Government should involve itself in research and development activities in the private sector.
John Danforth: “The planned short increases will enable a substantially higher Federal investment in technology with strong commercial…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing federal investment in technology and economic policy differences during a speech.
Share
More from John Danforth
as an original cosponsor of the Parents as Teachers Act, I rise to offer my support for Senator Bond's amendment to include the Parents as Teachers Program as part of Goals 2000. As Governor of Missouri, my colleague developed this fine…
But if the Senator will yield, a prayer that is out loud is not constitutionally prohibited. A prayer that is out loud is clearly permitted under the Constitution, but that does not mean that any schoolchild at any time of day during the…
Recently, a number of legislative initiatives have been launched that would have the government play an active role in the creation of venture capital firms. The underlying rationale is simple: There is, according to the sponsors, a…
Well, today at our hearing, we had as a witness, a vice president from Boeing. And because this statement has been made so frequently about how the aerospace industry has been subsidized, I put the question to the vice president from…





