There is not anything more important we can do for small business in a procurement issue than what we are doing with this amendment. Bundling is choking small business. It is hurting the taxpayer. It is hurting quality. This amendment is a major step forward to limiting it to cases where it is truly appropriate. From 1992 through 2001, 44.5 percent of DOD procurement dollars were in bundled contracts and therefore essentially off limits to small business competition. So in each one of those, there were fewer competitors. There was a tendency to have higher price and poorer quality for the taxpayers. And small businesses, which are supposed to have preferences under the statutes, actually were foreclosed from bidding.
James M. Talent: “There is not anything more important we can do for small business in a procurement issue than what we are doing with…”
On the recordMay 21, 2003
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of bundled contracts on small businesses and defense procurement.
Share
More from James M. Talent
Oct 28, 2019
I think success means protecting the American homeland, the territorial integrity of allies, the economy, from attacks.
May 2, 2017
We fear our military lacks the capability to attract, use, and keep the unconventional, technical, and cutting-edge talents and skills that it needs to meet future threats and new realities.
Oct 28, 2019
I think the top-level political authority, which you all represent, what is it you want the outcome of this to be and why?
Oct 28, 2019
I am concerned that this is real and that they are, the latest developments are reflective of what is actually happening and that they may be well ahead of us.





