No. We cannot get it. Under this bill, I get some money. It is going to help my State. And maybe under that, maybe Missouri's higher education will be able to get a little more of the budget because they will get a little bit of their money back from the Federal Government that they send here anyway. That is what the Schumer amendment does. I strongly support it. If Members really believe in States rights, if they really believe in building prisons and letting the legislature decide, I hope they have as good sense as the State of Missouri and a few other States that have truth-in-sentencing, because I believe in truth-in-sentencing. But I do not believe that I should dictate it to anybody, especially a State legislative body. I believe that that State legislative body and that Governor should be able to decide on its own what is good for their own State. I do not believe that I should make that decision for them. I do not believe that I have all the answers, that I am smarter than they are. That is what the bill says. You are smarter than the State legislative bodies and governors. I object to it. I feel strongly, I urge everybody to support the amendment of the gentleman from New York.
Harold Volkmer: “No. We cannot get it. Under this bill, I get some money. It is going to help my State. And maybe under that, maybe…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing support for the Schumer amendment related to state rights and truth-in-sentencing.
Share
More from Harold Volkmer
Yesterday was a big day for a lot of low-income American people that are hard working. The other body passed the minimum wage increase bill overwhelmingly. All the media talked about it, what a great thing it was for the low-income…
Now if this was purely a technical little provision that really did not harm anybody or do anything, they would not have that problem; would they?
we have just been through a little charade here in the House. The last two votes on motions to table were purely what I call a charade as part of the total coverup that is going on in the ethics investigation of our Speaker. You know…
this is for the purpose of making it clear that the appropriation on further studies and evaluations by this office over USDA will only be prospective for the coming year. It does not include any evaluation and studies that are ongoing at…





