This is for the purpose of making it clear that the appropriation on further studies and evaluations by this office over USDA will only be prospective for the coming year. It does not include any evaluation and studies that are ongoing at the present time, so that valid studies like for the electronic benefit transfer, WIC program, and stuff, that will continue. I have worked this out with the gentleman from New Mexico and the gentleman from Illinois. I do not believe there are any objections to the amendments.
Harold Volkmer: “This is for the purpose of making it clear that the appropriation on further studies and evaluations by this office over…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing appropriations for studies and evaluations related to USDA programs.
Share
More from Harold Volkmer
That explains why it was not in the bill when it passed the House and the Senate.
It is the effect of the resolution, is to give the Speaker the power of martial law.
It is time and the time is now that the chairperson of the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct, Nancy ``Stonewall'' Johnson, release that report on Speaker Gingrich so that we can all know what is in it. I do not know what is in it…
Now the gentleman from Georgia [Mr. Linder] goes on and says that the Lewis resolution reflected an ongoing and desperate action with a small band of Democrats who refused the ethics process by filing one baseless claim after another. Now…





