this is for the purpose of making it clear that the appropriation on further studies and evaluations by this office over USDA will only be prospective for the coming year. It does not include any evaluation and studies that are ongoing at the present time, so that valid studies like for the electronic benefit transfer, WIC program, and stuff, that will continue. I have worked this out with the gentleman from New Mexico and the gentleman from Illinois. I do not believe there are any objections to the amendments.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing appropriations for studies and evaluations related to USDA programs.
Share
More from Harold Volkmer
is this not another example of the entreme radical agenda of the majority? Is this not another example of the radical extremism of the majority?
Mr. Chairman, I won't take the full 5 minutes, but I come down a little bit different than the gentleman from California on this, because I know from personal relations with many people in my district that the weatherization program has…
Mr. Speaker, it is not any great pleasure that I come here today to be able to address the rule that is now before us. This is a rule that, when we as Democrats were in the majority, known as basically martial law, that we only used at the…
Now if this was purely a technical little provision that really did not harm anybody or do anything, they would not have that problem; would they?





