And there is no Gunderson proposal or anything else in this recommittal motion that can go to conference because there is not anything like that in here. The provision in here just lets it expire at the end of this year. Now it is going to be whether we do something or not before the end of the year if we want to do something, but the gentleman from New York [Mr. Solomon] is completely wrong in what he said about the dairy provision that is in here. All it does is permit the dairy provision to expire at the end of this year, what it does under present law.
Harold Volkmer: “And there is no Gunderson proposal or anything else in this recommittal motion that can go to conference because there…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a recommittal motion related to dairy provisions.
Share
More from Harold Volkmer
Mr. Chairman, I won't take the full 5 minutes, but I come down a little bit different than the gentleman from California on this, because I know from personal relations with many people in my district that the weatherization program has…
one newspaper in Connecticut appropriately describes the chairperson of the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct as ``Stonewall Johnson.'' That is a perfect, appropriate description of the gentlewoman from Connecticut, and she has…
is this not another example of the entreme radical agenda of the majority? Is this not another example of the radical extremism of the majority?
The gentleman would not have to do that. If he would have taken the coalition or the Blue Dog budget, he would not have had to do that. We would not be here today making this decision on these type of amendments if you would just forget…





