And there is no Gunderson proposal or anything else in this recommittal motion that can go to conference because there is not anything like that in here. The provision in here just lets it expire at the end of this year. Now it is going to be whether we do something or not before the end of the year if we want to do something, but the gentleman from New York [Mr. Solomon] is completely wrong in what he said about the dairy provision that is in here. All it does is permit the dairy provision to expire at the end of this year, what it does under present law.
Harold Volkmer: “And there is no Gunderson proposal or anything else in this recommittal motion that can go to conference because there…”
On the recordFebruary 29, 1996
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a recommittal motion related to dairy provisions.
Share
More from Harold Volkmer
Sep 27, 1996
Now if this was purely a technical little provision that really did not harm anybody or do anything, they would not have that problem; would they?
Sep 24, 1996
Is this not another example of the entreme radical agenda of the majority? Is this not another example of the radical extremism of the majority?
Sep 24, 1996
It is the effect of the resolution, is to give the Speaker the power of martial law.
Sep 19, 1996
One newspaper in Connecticut appropriately describes the chairperson of the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct as ``Stonewall Johnson.'' That is a perfect, appropriate description of the gentlewoman from Connecticut, and she has…





