I do not mind that, if that is the way it is going to go, not only on these types of bills, but also the controversial bills. It is not this bill and not the next bill. If you want to do open rules, I could care less, because I know there is not going to be any amendment. I am more concerned about with regard to an open rule, the gentleman says line-item veto, we are going to have all kinds of crime bills, I would like to see open rules on those. I can add some amendments to those. I would like to see open rules on those. I can add some amendments to those. I would like to see those open rules. To me an open rule on those bills is a lot more important than an open rule on these bills. The bill of the gentleman from California, nobody wants to touch that. It has been worked on, he has done a good job, and I think it should be passed. And I do not care if you put it under unanimous consent, or suspension, or an open rule, he is going to get his bill passed today. So I am not concerned about those. I am only concerned about the future.
Harold Volkmer: “I do not mind that, if that is the way it is going to go, not only on these types of bills, but also the controversial…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of open rules for future legislation during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Harold Volkmer
This is something that Bill Emerson worked on for about 10 years, and working together, he with a bridge in Cape Girardeau, I with a bridge in Hannibal, both across the Mississippi, and also with the Chouteau Bridge in Kansas City. Bill…
these words were spoken by a Member of this House several years ago: The 435 Members of the House should look at all the facts, should have available to them all the reports and all the background documents, and the American people should…
I appreciate the ruling of the Chair, and it is very apparent to me and, I hope, to Members of this House that the majority does not want any of the minority, anybody, talking about ethics questions on the floor of the House. They just do…
The gentleman would not have to do that. If he would have taken the coalition or the Blue Dog budget, he would not have had to do that. We would not be here today making this decision on these type of amendments if you would just forget…





