The gentleman would not have to do that. If he would have taken the coalition or the Blue Dog budget, he would not have had to do that. We would not be here today making this decision on these type of amendments if you would just forget the tax cut, forget it. Why do you not just forget it? We would not have to make these terrible decisions between choices of very good programs just so you can give money in a tax cut bill.
Harold Volkmer: “The gentleman would not have to do that. If he would have taken the coalition or the Blue Dog budget, he would not have…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing budget decisions and tax cuts during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Harold Volkmer
It is time and the time is now that the chairperson of the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct, Nancy ``Stonewall'' Johnson, release that report on Speaker Gingrich so that we can all know what is in it. I do not know what is in it…
Now if this was purely a technical little provision that really did not harm anybody or do anything, they would not have that problem; would they?
It is the effect of the resolution, is to give the Speaker the power of martial law.
It is very apparent, I think, to everybody out there that is seeing what is happening here, that Members of the House who are calling for this report to be made public are attempted to be gagged.





