It is an attempt to say that the criminal, the individual who commits the crime with this new technology, bears the burden of doing it and that the penalty would be increased on the individual. It is specifically what a lot of my colleagues have talked to me about, that it is the individual, the criminal, who ought to be penalized, and not the gun owner.
Harold Volkmer: “It is an attempt to say that the criminal, the individual who commits the crime with this new technology, bears the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the responsibility of criminals versus gun owners in relation to new technology.
Share
More from Harold Volkmer
That explains why it was not in the bill when it passed the House and the Senate.
It is time and the time is now that the chairperson of the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct, Nancy ``Stonewall'' Johnson, release that report on Speaker Gingrich so that we can all know what is in it. I do not know what is in it…
We have just been through a little charade here in the House. The last two votes on motions to table were purely what I call a charade as part of the total coverup that is going on in the ethics investigation of our Speaker. You know…
It is the effect of the resolution, is to give the Speaker the power of martial law.





