The Founding Fathers also provided for an amendment process to the Constitution because they knew that it would need that flexibility, because it could not predict the future nor foresee the future. This debate is, essentially, a nonpartisan debate on the issue of whether or not we need an amendment, constitutional amendment, to balance the Federal budget. Just because this Senator and the remaining Republican Senators in the Senate at the time did not agree with the Senator from Maryland that the way to bring the deficit down was to increase taxes $250 billion, but rather bring spending down $250 billion to move the budget deficit down, that does not make me opposed to bringing the deficit or the debt down. The truth of the matter is, those on this side who voted against that wanted to cut spending, not raise taxes.
Tina Smith: “The Founding Fathers also provided for an amendment process to the Constitution because they knew that it would need…”
On the recordFebruary 16, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the need for a constitutional amendment to balance the federal budget.
Share
More from Tina Smith
Jun 16, 2026
This is a way for us to get cleaner energy, renewable energy, lower cost energy and to create homegrown pathways for cutting costs and keeping economic opportunity here in the United States.
Aug 28, 2025
I dare you to go to Annunciation School and tell our grieving community, in effect, guns don’t kill kids, antidepressants do.
Sep 4, 2025
I stand before this body trying to make sense of the terrible shooting at Annunciation Catholic School, just a couple of miles from where Archie and I live in Minneapolis, and I can't. I can't make it make sense. You know, I know this…





