If we lose this vote and lose this technology and end this technology, ASAT, it, in my opinion, will be a direct threat to the thousands of American men and women all over the world who wear the uniforms of the Armed Forces of the United States. It is an unprecedented erosion of our constitutional prerogative. When we take the oath to the Constitution, we take an oath to protect and defend America. This protects and defends America. I have been hearing a lot of this talk. I have heard some of it already, and we will hear a lot more, about how we are going to do this stuff with lasers, disable all these satellites with laser technology, that that is the thing of the future. It might be, but it is not here yet. What are we going to do here in between? For those who might not care about the military application--or maybe you care about space junk--kinetic energy ASAT disables satellites. It does not break them up into hundreds of pieces and create space junk. It disables them. It is a very important point. I would think the Senate would want to think long and hard before ending this technology because this amendment will do that.
Tina Smith: “If we lose this vote and lose this technology and end this technology, ASAT, it, in my opinion, will be a direct threat…”
On the recordJune 19, 1996
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing the implications of ending ASAT technology during a Senate debate.
Share
More from Tina Smith
Jul 3, 2026
“The freedom to live and love openly without fear of retaliation is a fundamental American value,”
Aug 24, 2026
“Unlike every other federal judge in this country, Supreme Court Justices aren’t bound by a code of ethics. With no transparency and no enforcement mechanism, it’s no wonder the American people can’t trust the Supreme Court to police…
Jun 9, 2026
This is the way it goes, Americans have really busy complicated lives, they're trying to figure out how to pay rent and buy groceries, but what they saw, I don't think they're going to forget it.





