The minister of the church that I go to locally is a former Navy chaplain and also served in the Marines. He felt strongly enough about this issue it was part of his sermon yesterday. His response to the 6-year problem was that if this were a problem for the Marines, it would have been taken care of in 6 weeks or less. I would only suggest there is a problem. It is obvious it is great. The amendment is sort of mild. If the Air Force is with it, they will get it taken care of shortly before any of the reports in either of these amendments are required.
Martin Sabo: “The minister of the church that I go to locally is a former Navy chaplain and also served in the Marines. He felt…”
On the recordJune 20, 2005
Source
govinfo.govShare
More from Martin Sabo
Mar 16, 2006
let me just make a few comments. First, let me be clear. I have great appreciation for the work of the chairman of our committee, Mr. Rogers, and what he has done in this subcommittee. The work of his subcommittee has significantly…
Sep 29, 2006
reclaiming my time. All of the money that is needed for borders, for ports, all of the money we have appropriated can be spent?
May 17, 2005
I make a point of order. The Acting CHAIRMAN. The gentleman will state his point of order.
May 25, 2006
I move to strike the word. I just wanted to rise and agree with the chairman. This is an amendment that should not be adopted. We have already spent additional significant resources on the border. We are also starting the SDI program, the…





