If our goal is to balance the budget by 2002, this is the alternative that might actually do it. Mr. Chairman, we need a little humility when we project 6 years into the future. Many things can change. But if there is any plan that can actually work, it is the Orton proposal. It is tough, it is realistic, but it is also fair to people. It means less interest costs for the Federal Government. It is the one plan that might actually result in happening what we talk about; that a young family buying a new home might actually have lower mortgage payments because of lower interest rate costs. It is a good proposal, it is fair, it is workable, it is the one that can achieve our goals. I, in the strongest way I can, urge people to vote for this good alternative, and I congratulate the gentleman from Utah.
Martin Sabo: “If our goal is to balance the budget by 2002, this is the alternative that might actually do it. Mr. Chairman, we need a…”
Editor's note · Context
Supporting the Orton proposal for balancing the budget during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Martin Sabo
Yes, I do. The CHAIRMAN. Does any other Member wish to be heard on the point of order?
I come to this House debate deeply frustrated over the chaos in Iraq. I voted against authorizing President Bush to take us to war in Iraq. I believed in 2002, and am more certain today that this war has been a grave mistake. Mr. Speaker…
under my reservation, would the gentleman yield? The Acting CHAIRMAN. Does the gentleman insist on his point of order?
the Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act suggests that a number of factors are considered to measure the severity, magnitude and impact of a disaster and authorizes FEMA to provide individual assistance. I would be happy…





