I rise today to address the American people and give some insight into the fiscal priorities of the new Congressional leadership. This rescissions bill seeks to slash nearly one of every six dollars set aside for the disadvantaged in our country in fiscal year 1995. That represents a dramatic $17 billion, or 15.7% reduction in funding for federal domestic programs. In contrast, only 1.2% of the funding for the rest of the discretionary budget, including defense, is targeted for reductions. Today the new Congressional leadership sends a clear message: when it comes to making sacrifices in the federal budget, it's children, women, and senior citizens first. The Republicans terminate the summer youth program starting in 1995, and reduce $1.7 billion in funding for education programs including School-to-Work activities. Such ill-advised policy will produce modest reductions in expenditures in the short-term, but yield substantial long-term losses in the productivity and earning power of today's youth. I question the wisdom of striking directly at the programs which enable motivated young people to improve their own lives. Additionally, these rescissions terminate a program which teaches children about substance abuse and violence prevention, the Safe and Drug-Free Schools program. While this rescission will do little to cut the deficit, it does effectively cut through Republican rhetoric.
Martin Sabo: “I rise today to address the American people and give some insight into the fiscal priorities of the new Congressional…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the impact of a rescissions bill on federal funding for disadvantaged groups.
Share
More from Martin Sabo
I would suggest that from the answers this gentleman has given, that this clearly is putting additional responsibilities on the Department of Homeland Security. Point of Order The CHAIRMAN. Does the Chair understand the gentleman to insist…
let me just make a few comments. First, let me be clear. I have great appreciation for the work of the chairman of our committee, Mr. Rogers, and what he has done in this subcommittee. The work of his subcommittee has significantly…
Yes, I do. The CHAIRMAN. Does any other Member wish to be heard on the point of order?
under my reservation, would the gentleman yield? The Acting CHAIRMAN. Does the gentleman insist on his point of order?





