I have to say to my friend from Minnesota this instruction relates to discretionary spending, which is a little over a third of the budget. Its impact is significant on discretionary spending, which is a part of the budget that we also put tight restrictions on, as the gentleman knows, in the 1993 budget agreement. It is over 1.5 percent in budget authority over this period of time on top of real restraint that we stopped earlier. So, to talk about these as slivers is misleading.
Martin Sabo: “I have to say to my friend from Minnesota this instruction relates to discretionary spending, which is a little over a…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the significance of discretionary spending in the budget during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Martin Sabo
I am sorry that the point of order is raised. This provision does not undercut the ability of the committee to act. As a matter of fact, it encourages them to act. We have waited for years without any action on giving the Secretary the…
I rise in support of H.R. 3989 and join my Democratic and Republican colleagues from Minnesota in their unanimous support for designating the post office in Dennison, Minnesota as the ``Albert Harold Quie Post Office.'' Albert Quie is a…
I was sitting here waiting for time to expire so I could cast a vote, and I heard the motion made by the gentleman from New York. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Does the gentleman have a parliamentary inquiry?
And the chaplain at the Air Force who blew the whistle on this problem is no longer there?





