I have to say to my friend from Minnesota this instruction relates to discretionary spending, which is a little over a third of the budget. Its impact is significant on discretionary spending, which is a part of the budget that we also put tight restrictions on, as the gentleman knows, in the 1993 budget agreement. It is over 1.5 percent in budget authority over this period of time on top of real restraint that we stopped earlier. So, to talk about these as slivers is misleading.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the significance of discretionary spending in the budget during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Martin Sabo
No. What there is around the country is significant differences in health care costs and significant difference in Medicare reimbursements around the country. So, for most of the counties, most rural counties and even many urban areas…
That is right, but there are still significant parts of the country which would be asked to pay substantially more than actual costs. I have always tried to understand that rationalization. Over 95 percent of the counties, the actual costs…
The proposal before us has been promoted as family-friendly and fiscally responsible. Let us focus on just one provision that puts the lie to those claims. This proposal would charge market rates for the power supplied by three of the…
No, you eliminate all the subsidy plus ask 95 percent of the counties to pay more than 100 percent of their actual cost. So, they are being asked to--and I forget what the actual average is, something like $130 a month--there are…





