The proposal before us has been promoted as family-friendly and fiscally responsible. Let us focus on just one provision that puts the lie to those claims. This proposal would charge market rates for the power supplied by three of the Federal Government's power marketing administrations. Republicans estimate that charging these rates would increase revenues by $1.2 billion a year beginning in 1996. Sounds great. The problem is that $1.2 billion in electric rate increases, not a penny to the Federal Government because you do not change the term of the repayment. You will raise the electric rates. But the money will rest with those utilities, those power marketing administrations. Beyond that, there would be a net loss to the Treasury. We have electric rates of 25 to 60 percent across 13 Western States, which would trigger a series of business collapses, job losses, and all to make the deficit look better on paper; for millions of ratepayers, workers, and small business owners in the States of northern California, Colorado, Nevada, Arizona, Utah, Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Arkansas.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a proposal to charge market rates for federal power.
Share
More from Martin Sabo
I rise to commend him for this rule. It is a fair rule. It allows a variety of alternatives to be considered and debated by this Congress. But more importantly, I would like to say to the gentleman from South Carolina how much I and the…
That is right, but there are still significant parts of the country which would be asked to pay substantially more than actual costs. I have always tried to understand that rationalization. Over 95 percent of the counties, the actual costs…
No. What there is around the country is significant differences in health care costs and significant difference in Medicare reimbursements around the country. So, for most of the counties, most rural counties and even many urban areas…
I have to say to my friend from Minnesota this instruction relates to discretionary spending, which is a little over a third of the budget. Its impact is significant on discretionary spending, which is a part of the budget that we also put…





