Political Quotes

Martin Sabo: Mr. Chairman, I intend to vote no on this bill. Let me just say as background, before I came to Congress I spent 18…

On the recordJanuary 19, 1995
Mr. Chairman, I intend to vote no on this bill. Let me just say as background, before I came to Congress I spent 18 years in the State legislature, 8 years heavily involved with putting State budgets together, with that primary responsibility in dealing with the relationship of the State to local units of government throughout our State. So I fully understand the impact; maybe not fully, I understand partially, because I do not know if any of us understand fully the impact of the relationship between one unit of government to another, and I understand there is a problem of mandates. But what I fear is happening here is total overreaching. I find unbelievable that we could start as a basic premise of law, as a Federal Congress, to say to someone like me from Minnesota, at the top of the Mississippi, that if you want to dump your sewage into the Mississippi at the Iowa-Wisconsin border, it is of no relevance to the Federal Government unless the Federal Government pays the full bill. That is the concept of this legislation.
Said by
Martin Sabo
Minnesota

Editor's note · Context

Opposing a bill related to federal mandates and state government relationships.

Share

More from Martin Sabo

May 17, 2005

let me just simply thank the chairman for his support of the amendment. The CHAIRMAN. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Minnesota (Mr. Sabo). The amendment was agreed to.

govinfo.gov
May 17, 2005

I make a point of order. The Acting CHAIRMAN. The gentleman will state his point of order.

govinfo.gov
May 17, 2005

I know they are not hidden, but somebody has to find out. I have no idea how many endless grants they are making. The departments make an endless number of grants, and some of them flow to the State which then flow to local governments. In…

govinfo.gov
Jun 6, 2006

My question was not about local government. It was about whether DHS would be doing something under his amendment that they are not doing today.

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation