Political Quotes

Martin Sabo: Mr. Speaker, when H.R. 4328, the fiscal year 1999 transportation appropriations bill passed the House, it was a bill…

On the recordSeptember 15, 1998
Mr. Speaker, when H.R. 4328, the fiscal year 1999 transportation appropriations bill passed the House, it was a bill that was relatively free of antienvironmental riders. However, the Senate has attached to the bill several controversial riders that undermine important environmental protections. Mr. Speaker, this Motion to instruct addresses the most controversial of those riders which would amend the Alaskan National Interest Lands Conservation Act to permit helicopters to operate inland in all national wildlife refuges, national parks and wilderness study areas in Alaska. This motion to instruct directs the House conferees to disagree with this provision which is not in the House bill. Mr. Speaker, the Senate rider has no place in the transportation appropriations bill. First, the provision is a legislative provision that amends the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act, a law that is within the jurisdiction of the House Committee on Resources. Second, this provision is not simply a provision to clarify as some have claimed. It would rewrite 18 years of national environmental policy with potentially far-reaching impacts that, according to the National Park Service, could fundamentally change the character of national parks in Alaska.
Said by
Martin Sabo
Minnesota

Editor's note · Context

Addressing controversial riders attached to the fiscal year 1999 transportation appropriations bill.

Share

More from Martin Sabo

Jun 6, 2006

My question was not about local government. It was about whether DHS would be doing something under his amendment that they are not doing today.

govinfo.gov
May 17, 2005

I make a point of order. The Acting CHAIRMAN. The gentleman will state his point of order.

govinfo.gov
Jun 6, 2006

we are told by Customs and Border Patrol that this amendment has no effect on its operation because it only shares information when it is required by international treaty, the same as what this amendment says. So to the best of my…

govinfo.gov
May 17, 2005

I will continue to reserve my point of order, and I move to strike the last word. Mr. Chairman, I would like to have the gentleman explain the amendment to me. What is it that somebody at the Federal level has to do?

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation