And this amendment, as I understand it, would take some of this little money that we distribute throughout the country and say we are going to cut that from everyone. Where they are working, trying to coordinate expenditures to make most efficient use of it, take it from that and give them to a few areas where we have already increased the administration's budget by $500 million; am I right?
Discussing the implications of an amendment on budget distribution during a House debate.
Share
More from Martin Sabo
I would make a parliamentary inquiry of the Chair. The CHAIRMAN. The gentleman may state his inquiry.
I rise in support of H.R. 3989 and join my Democratic and Republican colleagues from Minnesota in their unanimous support for designating the post office in Dennison, Minnesota as the ``Albert Harold Quie Post Office.'' Albert Quie is a…
I know they are not hidden, but somebody has to find out. I have no idea how many endless grants they are making. The departments make an endless number of grants, and some of them flow to the State which then flow to local governments. In…
I was sitting here waiting for time to expire so I could cast a vote, and I heard the motion made by the gentleman from New York. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Does the gentleman have a parliamentary inquiry?
Other voices in this conversation
