On the recordSeptember 29, 2006
I have read the chemical bill language, and I do not understand whether that language preempts the ability of a State to adopt more stringent requirements than the Federal standards.
Source
govinfo.govMartin Sabo: “I have read the chemical bill language, and I do not understand whether that language preempts the ability of a State to…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the implications of a chemical bill on state regulations during a House debate.
Share
More from Martin Sabo
Jun 6, 2006
My question was not about local government. It was about whether DHS would be doing something under his amendment that they are not doing today.
May 25, 2006
I concur in the chairman's comments. You have a good amendment, and I am glad to support it.
Mar 16, 2006
I understand the majority has the right to close. The Acting CHAIRMAN. The gentleman is correct.
Jun 20, 2005
And the chaplain at the Air Force who blew the whistle on this problem is no longer there?
Other voices in this conversation
