No. We do have a river one but fairly small. So I think it would be fair to say we made a special effort to try to allocate more money to ports, that that will go to a limited part of the country.
Martin Sabo: “No. We do have a river one but fairly small. So I think it would be fair to say we made a special effort to try to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding allocation for ports during a congressional session.
Share
More from Martin Sabo
I have read the chemical bill language, and I do not understand whether that language preempts the ability of a State to adopt more stringent requirements than the Federal standards.
reclaiming my time. All of the money that is needed for borders, for ports, all of the money we have appropriated can be spent?
I thank the gentleman. I am just afraid we are doing another miniature No Child Left Behind in this law that we passed a couple of weeks ago. It is the Federal Government again deciding how the States should run something that States have…
we are told by Customs and Border Patrol that this amendment has no effect on its operation because it only shares information when it is required by international treaty, the same as what this amendment says. So to the best of my…





