Martin Sabo: “My understanding is that Mr. Pascrell and Mr. Marshall both have amendments to page 3 on line 15, so I assume what the…”

“My understanding is that Mr. Pascrell and Mr. Marshall both have amendments to page 3 on line 15, so I assume what the Chair is saying is that if the gentleman redrafted his amendment before we moved to some place beyond Pascrell and Marshall, he would be in order to offer a revised amendment. The CHAIRMAN. The gentleman is correct. Mr. DeFAZIO. Then I would withdraw. Unfortunately, that would mean that we would have to replicate the debate. It would be better if the chairman just rose in opposition as he is going to later and he voted ``no'' and I voted ``aye'' and we had a recorded vote. If the gentleman insists on his point of order, I ask unanimous consent to withdraw my amendment at this point in time and offer the amendment later. I was offering a way to save the body time. The CHAIRMAN. Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from Oregon? There was no objection. Amendment Offered by Mr. Pascrell”